MUKESH KUMAR v. UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY JAL SHAKTI DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2989/2026 · 2026-09-21
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3306 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3306 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2989/2026 CM No. 6582/2026
Mukesh Kumar …..Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sumir Pandita, Advocate.
Vs
UT of J&K & Ors. .….Respondent Through: Ms. Nazia Fazal, Assisting Counsel vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (21.09.2026)
01. Mr. Sumir Pandita, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that there is a formal defect in the writ petition on account of non-impleadment of Jal Shakti Department (PHE) and, therefore, he seeks liberty to withdraw the present writ petition with permission to file a fresh one. Prayer allowed.
02. The present writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn along with connected application with liberty as prayed for.
03. Fresh writ petition shall be filed by or before 12.10.2026.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
21.09.2026
Bunty
Serial No. 17 Regular List Bunty Kumar 2026.09.25 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document