HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15065 of 2026 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 50 of 2026, under Sections 109(1), 352 of the B.N.S., Police Station- Kotwali, District- Jaunpur, during the pendency of the trial. 3. The learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further contends that the applicant although named in the First Information Report (FIR) along with two other accused and one unknown, has been given a general role of assaulting the injured. Later on, in the statement of witnesses, the applicant has been assigned the specific role of causing head injury to the injured. The learned counsel further contends that there are only two visible injuries and there are three other complaints of pain. He further contends that in the CT Scan report of the head, no abnormality was detected. The applicant has no criminal history. He is in jail since 09.03.2026. 4. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail, however, could not dispute the fact that there is no internal damage found in the medical examination reports of the injured. 5. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. 6. The applicant has been assigned a general role in the FIR. Even in the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajeet Kumar Srivastava, Ashish Singh, Saurabh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sanavar Husain .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) first statement of the injured, no specific role of causing head injury have been assigned to the applicant. It is in the second statement of the witnesses recorded on 15.03.2026 that a specific role of assaulting have been assigned to the applicant. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. No injury has been opined to be grievous in nature or dangerous to life. 7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, and taking into account entire facts and circumstances, as enumerated above, I deem it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant. 8. Let the applicant – Sanavar Husain, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: i. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. iii. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. iv. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial Court, unless his personal appearance is exempted by the Court concerned. 9. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the Court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his/her bail. 10. It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of computer generated copy of this order, downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days. 11. It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant. May 5, 2026 Kushal BAIL No. 15065 of 2026 2 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad