RAGHBIR SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/18391/2026 · 2026-07-23
Subhas Mehla, Vikas Bahl
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33057 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33057 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-18391-2026 Date of decision: 23.07.2026 RAGHBIR SINGH AND OTHERS ...PETITIONERS
V/S
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA
Present: Mr. Ritik Khurana, Advocate for
Mr. Deepak Jaglan, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
**** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
1.
This is a Civil writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the official respondents to take appropriate action and to stop the private respondent No.11 from developing illegal and unauthorized colony over the 9 acres agricultural land of village Indergarh, Tehsil Indri, District Karnal.
2.
Learned counsel for respondents-State has submitted that in pursuance of the complaint given by the petitioners, an FIR bearing No.152 dated 26.02.2026 has been registered against respondent No.11 and has further submitted that State has also directed the Tehsildar, Indri, not to register any sale deed with respect to land in question.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the above, the present writ petition be disposed of.
4.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of.
(VIKAS BAHL)
JUDGE
(SUBHAS MEHLA) July 23, 2026
JUDGE Manisha
(i) Whether speaking/reasoned
Yes/No
(ii) Whether reportable
Yes/No MANISHA 2026.07.24 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document