06.08.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 301. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (A) 2162 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Raiganj PS Case No. 0628 of 2026 dated 17.06.2026 under sections 351(2)/62/64/74/75/78/79 of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of : Md. Abrar Alam ……Petitioner. Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya, Sr. Adv. Mr. Samim Ahammed Mr. Asif Ikbal Baidya Ms. Reshma Khatun Mr. Md. Nazirul Haque Ms. Zoya Eram ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Sanjoy Bardhan Mr. Kaushik Choudhury Mr. Dwaipayan Panda ….for the Victim/Defacto Complainant/OP No. 2. Mr. Tirtheswar Das ……for the State. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and foisted with the present criminal case which has no legs to stand. The complaint itself is absurd and motivated. Learned advocate for the defacto complainant opposes the prayer for bail. 2 Learned advocate for the State has produced the case diary referred to the statement under Section 183 of the BNSS of the victim. There are some deficiencies definitely in a case of this nature but having considered the statement of the victim before the learned Judicial Magistrate, I am not inclined to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail in CRM (A) 2162 of 2026 is refused. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)