18.08.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.14 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Rejected C.R.M. (A) 1867 of 2026 In Re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Paikar Police Station Case No. 102 of 2026 dated 31.03.2026 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/110/ 74/303(2)/351(2)/351(3)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In Re : Nur Alam Sekh and others ... Petitioners. Ms. Ipsita Ghosh, Mr. Souvik Ganguly ... For the Petitioners. Mr. Soumya Raha ... For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent of the charges and there has been dispute between both the parties, one being the bride and another being the bridegroom party, consequent to which the present case has been initiated. Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and produces the case diary along with the injury reports as well as the statement of some of the eyewitnesses. Records reflect that the present petitioners were teasing ladies of the complainant’s house, consequent to which the incident took place. Having regard to the genesis of the present case, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the present petitioners. 2 As such, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. Memo of Evidence submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. The application for anticipatory bail, being CRM (A) 1867 of 2026, is, thus, dismissed. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)