Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33032 (PNJ)

SONIA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/40161/2026 · 2026-07-23

Ramesh Kumari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 101 SONIA STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE Present : Dr. Payel Mehta Mr. Siddharth Attri, AAG, Punjab. RAMESH KUMARI After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present petition. Ordered 23.07.2026 Jyoti-IV IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of decision: Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI Dr. Payel Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharth Attri, AAG, Punjab. **** RAMESH KUMARI, J. (oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present petition. Ordered accordingly. Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.40161 of 2026 Date of decision: 23.07.2026 …. Petitioner …. Respondents RAMESH KUMARI , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharth Attri, AAG, Punjab. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner (RAMESH KUMARI) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner ) JYOTI 2026.07.23 18:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document