VED S/O SANJIT RAJPUT AND ANR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS ANDHALGAON DIST. BHANDARA
BA/862/2026 · 2026-08-17
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3303 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3303 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 40-Cr.BA-862-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION [B.A.] NO. 862 OF 2026 Ved s/o Sanjit Rajput and Another -- VERSUS -- State of Maharashtra __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Mr. K.J. Rawandhe, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. N.R. Rode, A.P.P. for the Non-applicant/State.
CORAM :
M.M. NERLIKAR, J.
DATE :
AUGUST 17, 2026.
Heard.
2.
At the outset, the learned A.P.P. submits that the trial is at the fag end. Already 7 witnesses are examined and hardly 3-4 witnesses are remained to be examined, which could be examined within 3-4 weeks.
3.
Upon this, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present application, with liberty to file fresh bail application after two months, in case, the trial is not concluded within two months.
4.
Permission granted. The Criminal Application is disposed of as withdraw, with liberty as prayed for.
[ M.M. NERLIKAR, J ] Piyush Mahajan 2026:BHC-NAG:10646 Signed by: Piyush Ramesh Mahajan Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 18/08/2026 13:04:04