Ravi Ranjan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./5355/2026 · 2026-01-31
R P Mishra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33028 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33028 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5355 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-167 Year-2025 Thana- INDRAPURI District- Rohtas ====================================================== Ravi Ranjan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar S/o Ashok Singh Resident of village- Patnnwa @ Patanwa kala (patnawa kala Indarpura), PS- Indrapuri, Distirct- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md Danish Quamar, Advocate Mr. Madina Moneer, For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Pushpa Sinha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 31-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Indrapuri P.S. Case No. 167 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 50 liters of country made liquor was recovered from Jute sack.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5355 of 2026(2) dt.31-01-2026 2/2 for the petitioner further submitted that the recovery has been made from jute sack. The petitioner has not been apprehended on the spot. The Apprehended co-accused has disclosed the name of petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 12.12.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Indrapuri P.S. Case No. 167 of 2025.
manish/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T