Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33027 (CAL)

ACHINTA SIKARI @ BHOROT v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/1039/2026 · 2026-08-19

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

19.08.2026 Court No.35. D/L.47. Rakib (Allowed) CRM (M) 1039 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kotwali Police Station case no. 678 of 2021 dated 17.07.2021 under Sections 498A/326A/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. And In the matter of : Achinta Sikari @ Bhorot. ……Petitioner. Mr. Khalid Hasan Mr. Subhendu Das Mr. N. Ahamed .....for the Petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Banerjee, Ld. APP Ms. Tanusree Kar ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for more than five years and till date there has been no possibility of the trial being taken to its logical conclusion and the case arose out of matrimonial dispute. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that one witness has been examined and the total number of witnesses relied upon by the prosecution is 24. Having considered the further time which would be required to take the trial to its logical conclusion and without entering into the merits of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner, namely, Achinta Sikari @ Bhorot shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of 2 Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Krishnanagar, Nadia. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of district of Nadia without prior permission of the learned Trial Court. Thus, CRM (M) No. 1039 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)