[2026:RJ-JP:18125] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7756/2026 Ghanshyam Yadav S/o Deshraj Yadav, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Dhundhariya, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj) 2. Director Secondary Education Rajasthan, Bikaner (Raj). 3. Principal, Shaheed Narendra Kumar Govt. Senior Secondary School, Rodwal, Block Neemrana, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj). 4. Mahendra Singh Yadav, Working As Lecturer (Hindi Literature) At Govt. Senior Secondary School, Bhajera, District Alwar, (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Yadav For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 29/04/2026 1. The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition challenging his impugned transfer order dated 10.01.2026 whereby he has been transferred from Behror to Dholpur on a vacant post where no person is working. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been transferred just to accommodate and adjust respondent No. 4. 3. This Court considered the order dated 19.02.2026 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the previous round of [2026:RJ-JP:18125] (2 of 2) [CW-7756/2026] litigation where Court drew distinction on account of the fact that the transfer was made in the mid of the session and Board examinations were already scheduled and therefore, petitioner prayed in the previous round as well not be disturbed on account of that. 4. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the previous round stayed the impugned transfer order. Now, the petitioner has again approached this Court with the same grievance. 5. This Court finds that now there is no genuine difficulty shown by the petitioner in regard to the impugned transfer order and the law with regard to the transfer is well settled that transfer is a part of service conditions of an employee which should not be interfered with ordinarily by a Court of law in exercise of its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 6. This Court finds no reason to make interference with the same. 7. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed, no order as to costs. 8. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J PARSHANT/11