Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
17
13.08. 2026
Ct. No. 18
Ab
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE.
WPA 19921 of 2026
Sudip Sarkar Vs. The State of West Bengal and others. ---------------
Mr. Manujendra Narayan Roy. … for the petitioner. Dr. Siddhartha Goswami, Ms. Priyanka Shukla, Ms. Sweta Singh. … for the State.
1. As fairly submitted by Mr. Roy, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, that the selfsame grievance of the petitioner is pending redressal before the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal in OA 457 of
2020.
2. In view of the decision in WP.ST 209 of 2025 (Anindya Sudar Das vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.), there is no urgency in this matter, as the same has been pending since 2020.
3. In view of the afore-stated, WPA 19921 of 2026 cannot be entertained at this stage. Accordingly, the same is dismissed.
4. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
5. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis.
(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)
2