Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33012 (KAR)

M/S NAGSON AND COMPANY v. LIC HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED

WP/26037/2026 · 2026-08-19

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010578792026 NC: 2026:KHC:44581 WP No. 26037 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 26037 OF 2026 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: M/S NAGSON AND COMPANY A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM AT NO.42, INDUSTRIAL SUBURB 2ND STAGE, YESHWANTHPUR BANGALORE - 560 022 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER MR. K.N. BALASUBRAMANYAM AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.S. VENKATARAMANA, ADVOCATE) AND: LIC HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED AT BOMBAY LIFE BUILDING, 2ND FLOOR NO.45/47, VEER NARASIMAN ROAD MUMBAI - 400 001, INDIA BENGALURU BACK OFFICE AT: NO.15/1, HAYES CENTRE, HAYES ROAD, BANGALORE-560025 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. UMASHANKARA .S., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010578792026 NC: 2026:KHC:44581 WP No. 26037 of 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.K.S.Venkataramana, counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Umashankara S., counsel for caveator / respondent appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. Counsel, therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. The oral submission and the memo is placed on record. As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS: List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21