Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33012 (CHH)

PRATHMIK KRISHI SAKH SAHKARI SAMITI UDELA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3114/2021 · 2026-08-10

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010170502021 2026:CGHC:35437 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3105 of 2021 Prathmik Krishi Sakh Sahkari Samiti Salkhand Registration No. 859, Through Samiti Prabandhak - Hare Krishna Banjare, S/o Shri Ram Lal Banjare, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Mungadih, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Food And Civil Supplies, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahkari Vipran Sangh Maryadit Through Managing Director, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Through Chief Executive Officer, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.08.12 17:07:13 +0530 2 WPC No. 3114 of 2021 1 - Prathmik Krishi Sakh Sahkari Samiti Udela Registration No. 1212, Through Samiti Prabandhak-Basant Lal Nayak, S/o Shri Bhujbal Prasad Nayak Aged About 51 Years R/o Lohdipur, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Food And Civil Supplies, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahkari Vipran Sangh Maryadit Through Managing Director, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur Chhattigarh 3 - Zila Shakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Through Chief Executive Officer, Raipur Chhattisgarh --- Respondents For petitioners : Mr. Shivendra Kumar, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Aman Sharma, Advocate For State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Govt. Advocate Respondent no. 2 : Mr. Ashish Surana, Advocate appears through video conferenceing Respondent no. 3 : Mr. Manas Vajpai, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 11.08.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that these writ petitions have rendered infructuous, therefore, he is not pressing these writ petitions. 3 2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, these writ petitions stands dismissed as not pressed. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Alfiza JUDGE