DAINILLA SANGMA AND 2 ORS. v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 5 ORS.
MC(WPC)/19/2026 · 2026-04-02
H S Thangkhiew
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
Serial No.56 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
MC[WP(C)]. No. 19 of 2026 in WP(C). No. 69 of 2026
Date of Decision: 02.04.2026
1. Smti. Dainilla Sangma, W/o Rengstone Marak, R/o. Alokdia Village, PS Tikrikilla, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
2. Smti. Selony Ch. Marak W/o. Nemso Ch. Marak R/o. Alokdia Village, PS Tikrikilla, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
3. Smti. Nethmy Momin, W/o. Albert N. Sangma R/o. Alokdia Village, PS Tikrikilla, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
…Applicants
-Versus-
1. State of Meghalaya represented by the Commissioner & Secretary, Community & Rural Development Government of Meghalaya.
2. The Deputy Commissioner & District Programme Co-coordinator MGNREGS West Garo Hills District Meghalaya.
3.
The BDO(MGNREGS), Demdema C&RD Block, West Garo Hills, District Meghalaya.
2026:MLHC:296
2
4. Smti. Sonalin M. Sangma D/o. Pison Marak R/o. Alokdia P.S Tikrikilla, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
5. Smti. Jenny A. Marak, D/o. Sundaybirth Sangma R/o. Alokdia P.S Tikrikilla West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
6. Smti. Menjit M. Marak R/o. Alokdia P.S Tikrikilla West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
…Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge
Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. P.T.Sangma, Adv.
Ms. J.T.Sangma, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. S.A.Sheikh, GA for R 1-3.
Ms. E.Pajuh, Adv. for R 4-6
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press:
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Mr. P.T.Sangma, learned counsel for the applicants submits that due to some incurable defects, he prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant misc. application with liberty to file afresh. 2026:MLHC:296
3
2. The same is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents.
3. Accordingly, the same is allowed and the misc. application stands closed and disposed of on withdrawal with liberty as prayed.
Judge
2026:MLHC:296 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.04.02 17:57:50 IST