Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Meghalaya · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33 (MEG)

DAINILLA SANGMA AND 2 ORS. v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 5 ORS.

MC(WPC)/19/2026 · 2026-04-02

H S Thangkhiew

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Serial No.56 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC[WP(C)]. No. 19 of 2026 in WP(C). No. 69 of 2026 Date of Decision: 02.04.2026 1. Smti. Dainilla Sangma, W/o Rengstone Marak, R/o. Alokdia Village, PS Tikrikilla, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. 2. Smti. Selony Ch. Marak W/o. Nemso Ch. Marak R/o. Alokdia Village, PS Tikrikilla, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. 3. Smti. Nethmy Momin, W/o. Albert N. Sangma R/o. Alokdia Village, PS Tikrikilla, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. …Applicants -Versus- 1. State of Meghalaya represented by the Commissioner & Secretary, Community & Rural Development Government of Meghalaya. 2. The Deputy Commissioner & District Programme Co-coordinator MGNREGS West Garo Hills District Meghalaya. 3. The BDO(MGNREGS), Demdema C&RD Block, West Garo Hills, District Meghalaya. 2026:MLHC:296 2 4. Smti. Sonalin M. Sangma D/o. Pison Marak R/o. Alokdia P.S Tikrikilla, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. 5. Smti. Jenny A. Marak, D/o. Sundaybirth Sangma R/o. Alokdia P.S Tikrikilla West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. 6. Smti. Menjit M. Marak R/o. Alokdia P.S Tikrikilla West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. P.T.Sangma, Adv. Ms. J.T.Sangma, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S.A.Sheikh, GA for R 1-3. Ms. E.Pajuh, Adv. for R 4-6 i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. Mr. P.T.Sangma, learned counsel for the applicants submits that due to some incurable defects, he prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant misc. application with liberty to file afresh. 2026:MLHC:296 3 2. The same is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Accordingly, the same is allowed and the misc. application stands closed and disposed of on withdrawal with liberty as prayed. Judge 2026:MLHC:296 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.04.02 17:57:50 IST