Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32995 (KAR)

SRI CHANDRU R v. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER

WP/18953/2023 · 2026-07-28

M G S Kamal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010446552023 NC: 2026:KHC:39628 WP No. 18953 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 18953 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI CHANDRU R AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS S/O LATE RAJU REDDY R/AT NALLURAHALLI VILLAGE WHITEFIELD POST, KRISHNARAJAPURA HOBLI BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU -560 066 ALSO AT: NO 160 HENNUR MAIN ROAD KACHARKANAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 084 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RUDRABHUSHAN C.B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD A INCORPORATED IN 1978 AS THE FINANCIAL SERVICES ARM OF THE MURUGAPPA GROUP DARE HOUSE 2, N C S BOSE ROAD PARRYS, CHENNAI - 600 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010446552023 NC: 2026:KHC:39628 WP No. 18953 of 2023 2. SMT UMA L AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS W/O LATE RAJU REDDY R/AT NO.160, HENNUR MAIN ROAD KACHARKANAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 084 3. DMR ENTERPRISES PROPRIETORSHIP REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR SMT UMA L NO.160, HENNUR MAIN ROAD KACHARKANAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 084 …RESPONDENTS (R1 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WP IS FILED PRAYING TO QUASH/SET-ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 08/08/2023 PASSED BY CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU IN CRL.MISC.NO. 545 OF 2023 VIDE ANNEXURE- A. GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY ON IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 08/08/2023 PASSED BY CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU IN CRL.MISC.NO.545/2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010446552023 NC: 2026:KHC:39628 WP No. 18953 of 2023 ORAL ORDER This petition is filed in view of respondent No.1 initiating the proceedings under the SARFAESI Act. Since an alternate effective remedy provided under the Act, the petitioner is at liberty to avail the same if so advised, within 30 days from the date of the receipt of certified copy of this order. If such steps are taken within the stipulated time, time consumed in this writ petition will be considered for condonation of delay. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE SPV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11