201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- CRM-M-32938-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 20.07.2026 Rimpi @ Rimpy ....Petitioners VERSUS State of Punjab ....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SHEKHAWAT Present: Ms. Himani Kapila, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. DAG Punjab. -.- N.S.SHEKHAWAT J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of BNSS/438 Cr.P.C for grant of anticipatory bail to the her in FIR No.47, dated 02.05.2026 registered under Sections 331(6), 324(4), 118(1), 115(2), 190, 191(3) of BNS (corresponding Sections 458, 427, 324, 323, 148 and 149 IPC) [ later on Section 117(2) of BNS/325 IPC has been added], at Police Station Purana Shalla, District Gurdaspur. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. As per the complaintant, the petitioner was allegedly carrying a iron rod and had inflicted injury on the left little finger of the complainant. She further submits that the said injury has been declared to be grievous in nature, but still she is accused of bailable offence. She further contends that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and is ready and willing to join the investigation. She further placed reliance on the order dated 27.05.2026 passed in CRM-M-30677-2026, whereby TRIPTI SAINI 2026.07.22 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-32938-2026 (O&M) -2- Kailasho and Paramjit Singh @ Pinchu @ Prince has already been granted concession of anticipatory bail. 3. Mr. Manuj Nagrath, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant and has filed his power of attorney, which is taken on record. 4. Learned State counsel assisted by learned counsel for the complainant has opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner along with her co-accused had attacked the complainant side with sharp-edged weapons and therefore she does not deserve the concession of pre-arrest bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and carefully perused the record. 6. In the present case, the petitioner had allegedly caused injury with an iron rod on the left little finger of the complainant and the injured has already been discharged. Apart from that the petitioner is a lady and was never involved in any other criminal case. 7. Consequently, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed. The interim protection granted to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to the petitioner joining the investigation as and when required by the Investigating Officer and continuing to abide by the conditions stipulated under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. July 20, 2026 (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) tripti JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : Yes/No TRIPTI SAINI 2026.07.22 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document