Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32975 (PNJ)

KARTIK ALIAS KARTI DAYMA v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/33247/2026 · 2026-07-22

Virinder Aggarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

POONAM 2026.07.23 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-33247-2026 (O&M) -2- 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 09.06.2026 passed by the Court, the petitioner has joined and cooperated with the investigation. 4. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Ranveer Singh states that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the petition is allowed and the interim order dated 09.06.2026 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 22nd July, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.07.23 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document