Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32973 (CHH)

Surit Lal Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh

WPS/10369/2019 · 2026-08-04

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010399642019 2026:CGHC:34136 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10369 of 2019 Surit Lal Patel S/o Late Shri Prannath Patel Aged About 60 Years Posted As Lecturer In Government Higher Secondary School Chandrapur, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Deputy Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Chief Executive Officer District Panchayat, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 5 - Shri Rakesh Kumar Sahu Aged About 55 Years, Working As Principal Janjgir, R/o Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 6 - Nagendra Kumar Patel Aged About 44 Years, Working As Principal, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : None in two rounds. For Respondents : Mr. Sharad Mishra, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 05.08.2026 1. None appeared for the petitioner in two rounds today. Even, on SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 29.07.2026 also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in further prosecuting this petition. 2. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. s@if sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge