RAM SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/21774/2026 · 2026-07-20
Subhas Mehla, Vikas Bahl
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32972 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32972 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-21774-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr.No.138 CWP-21774-2026 Decided on : 20.07.2026 Ram Singh and others
...... Petitioners
Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL *** Present : Mr. Parmod Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pardeep Prakash Chahar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Dinesh Kaushik and Mr. Tanvir S.Grewal, Advocates for respondent No.5. *** VIKAS BAHL
J (ORAL)
1. This is a Civil Writ Petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for setting aside the illegal instructions dated 21.06.2022 (Annexure P-4), issued by respondent No.1.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has fairly submitted that the said instructions have already been set aside by the Coordinate Division Bench of this Court in the judgment dated 17.03.2023 (Annexure P-1) and has further stated that the operation of the said judgment has been stayed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide order dated 01.12.2023 (Annexure P-2). It MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.07.22 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh
CWP-21774-2026 2 is submitted that in the said circumstances, the present writ petition be
disposed of.
3. In view of the same, the present petition is disposed of.
(VIKAS BAHL)
JUDGE
(SUBHAS MEHLA) 20.07.2026
JUDGE mamta Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.07.22 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh