114 HARYANA SH PANCHKULA THROUGH CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AND OTHERS JAGBIR SINGH CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) CM-3882 days in filing the appeal. is supported by a duly sworn affidavit, days in filing the appeal, is condoned. LPA-1588 1. 09.02.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No.21484 of 2020. 2. this Court is not inclined to grant any relief, submits the prese pressed any further. 3. 4. 21-07-2026 Sapna Goyal NOTE: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-3882- LPA-1588 Date of Decision : HARYANA SHAHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN (HSVP), SECTOR PANCHKULA THROUGH CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AND OTHERS VERSUS JAGBIR SINGH ARYA AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SI Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate for the appellant. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 3882-LPA-2026 Present application has been filed for condoning the delay of 64 days in filing the appeal. Keeping in view the contents mentioned in the application, is supported by a duly sworn affidavit, the same is allowed and the delay of 64 days in filing the appeal, is condoned. 1588-2026 (O&M) In the present appeal, challenge is to the 09.02.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No.21484 of 2020. After vehemently arguing at considerable length and realizing that this Court is not inclined to grant any relief, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) 2026 Sapna Goyal (AMARINDER SINGH G NOTE: Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable: NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -3883-LPA-2026 in/and 1588-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 21.07.2026 PRADHIKARAN (HSVP), SECTOR PANCHKULA THROUGH CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AND OTHERS ........APPELLANT VERSUS AND ANOTHER ........RESPONDENTS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Deepak Balyan, Advocate for the appellant. Present application has been filed for condoning the delay of 64 Keeping in view the contents mentioned in the application, which the same is allowed and the delay of 64 In the present appeal, challenge is to the judgment dated 09.02.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No.21484 of 2020. at considerable length and realizing that this Court is not inclined to grant any relief, learned counsel for the appellant nt appeal may kindly be disposed of as having been not Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE / reasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO PRADHIKARAN (HSVP), SECTOR-6, RESPONDENTS Present application has been filed for condoning the delay of 64 which the same is allowed and the delay of 64 judgment dated at considerable length and realizing that learned counsel for the appellant nt appeal may kindly be disposed of as having been not SAPNA GOYAL 2026.07.23 13:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document