1 CGHC010129002025 2026:CGHC:36256 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 458 of 2025 1 - Smt. Gomti Chhadimadi W/o Shivprasad Chhadimadi Aged About 43 Years Resident Of B/256. Adarsh Nagar, Kusmunda, P.S. - Kusumunda, Tehsil - Dipka, District - Korba, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Abhav Kumar Chhadimadi S/o Shiv Prasad Chhadimadi Aged About 17 Years Through Natural Guardian Petitioner No.1(Mother) Resident Of B/256. Adarsh Nagar, Kusmunda, P.S. - Kusumunda, Tehsil - Dipka, District - Korba, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Ayush Kumar S/o Shiv Prasad Chhadimadi Aged About 12 Years Through Natural Guardian Petitioner No.1(Mother) Resident Of B/256. Adarsh Nagar, Kusmunda, P.S. - Kusumunda, Tehsil - Dipka, District - Korba, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicants versus Shiv Prasad Chhadimadi S/o Mahesh Prasad Aged About 53 Years Working As Surveyor, Land Revenue, N.C.L, Headquarter Singrauli Family Guest House, Ncl Headquarter, Singraouli, (M.P.). Also At - Ward No..30, Near Fci Godown, Sinhpur Road, Shahdol, District - Shahdol (Mp), And Houe No. B/36, Ceti Colony, Singraouli, Post - Singraouli, District - Singrouli (M.P.) ... Non-applicant For Applicants : None For Non-applicant : None RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 14.08 .20 26 1. None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the applicants to press this revision on repeated calls. 2. The present revision petition has been :led by the applicants with the following prayer:- “In light of the aforesaid facts and circumstances the Applicant humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to: A. Call for the entire records of the case; and/or, B. Allow the present revision petition and set aside the impugned $nal judgment and order dated 21.01.2025 passed by the Ld. Principal Judge, Camp Family Court at Katghora, District Korba (C.G.)in Criminal Miscellaneous Judicial Case (Cr.M.J.C) No. 73/2023; and/or, C. Grant a sum of maintenance of Rs. 50,000/- per month to the Applicants from the date of $ling of application, in the interest of justice, and considering the factors laid down in the case of Rajnesh v. Neha, (2021) 2 SCC 324 or any other sum of amount as the Hon'ble Court may deem $t, and/or; 3 D. Pass such other orders, directions & reliefs, which this Hon'ble Court may think $t & proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. It appears that with the passage of time, the applicant has lost interest in pursuing this matter. 4. Accordingly, this revision is dismissed on this ground alone. Interim relief if any stands vacated. 5. Let a copy of this order as well as original records be transmitted to the trial Court concerned forthwith for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan