Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3297 (UTT)

VIKAS KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/975/2026 · 2026-04-18

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:2815 SL. No. Dat e Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/975/2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Tilak Ram Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. G.S. Negi, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent no. 1. 3. Mr. Maneesh Bisht, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 to 4. 4. Petitioner was employed as driver in State Infrastructure and Industrial Development Corporation of Uttarakhand (SIIDCUL). He was dismissed from service, vide order dated 12.10.2023. 5. According to the petitioner, he has filed an appeal against dismissal order, which was submitted before the Chairman, SIIDCUL, on 11.06.2024, but the same has not been decided so far. 6. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought a direction to the Appellate Authority to take decision on the pending appeal. 7. Mr. Maneesh Bisht, learned counsel, holding brief of Mr. Vipul Sharma, learned counsel for the SIIDCUL assures that pending appeal would be decided, positively within eight weeks. 8. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with a direction to the Chairman, SIIDCUL to consider and decide petitioner’s appeal, as per law, within eight weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order, before him. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 18.04.2026 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df00 6da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875 643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.04.18 16:38:18 +05'30'