CRM-M-40072-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 119 CRM-M-40072-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 23.07.2026 AMARJIT KAUR .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner(s) for transfer of complaint UID No.778170 dated 25.03.2026 (P.G. Portal) from Police Station Women Cell, Kapurthala to any other Senior Police Official outside District Kapurthala or from Bureau of Investigation or any other independent investigating agency as the petitioner and her son are face grave and serious threats from Station House Officer, Women Cell, Kapurthala. 2. The learned counsel representing the petitioner(s) submits that the petitioner(s) has filed the representation (Annexure P-1) before the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for disposing of the present petition by issuing directions to the respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.07.23 18:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-40072-2026 (O&M) 2 3. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 4/States only. 4. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab appears on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4/State. Hence service of notice upon the State is hereby dispensed with. 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is hereby directed that by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order, the representation of petitioner(s) (Annexure P-1) be disposed of either by the Director General of Police, Punjab (respondent No.2) or, on assignment by him, by any other police officer not below the rank of Senior Superintendent of Police. It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own level. 6. In view of above, the present petition is hereby disposed of. 23.07.2026 (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) Vinod JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.07.23 18:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document