Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32966 (PNJ)

DILPREET SINGH @ DIL v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/24107/2026 · 2026-07-22

Sanjay Vashisth

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

235+340 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-24107-2026 DILPREET SINGH @ DIL .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT CRM-M-37861-2026 DHARMINDER SINGH SIDHU @ DHARMINDER SINGH @ BAGGA .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT DECIDED ON: 22.07.2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH. Present: Mr. RDS Bhullar, Advocate, for the petitioner (in CRM-M-24107-2026) and Mr. Ruhani Chadha, Advocate, for the petitioner (in CRM-M-37861-2026) (through VC). Mr. Vinay Malhotra, DAG, Punjab. SANJAY VASHISTH, J (ORAL) 1. Present petitions have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (Earlier 439 CrPC) for grant of Regular Bail to the Petitioners, in FIR No.68 dated 19.04.2024, under Sections 302, 307, 353, 186, 120-B, 332, 148, 149 of IPC (sections 506, 201, 379-B, 326, 325, 324 of IPC added later on) [corresponding to sections 103, 109, 132, 221, 61(2), 121(1), 191(3), 190 of BNS (351(2), (3), 328, 303(2), 118(2), 117(2), 118(1) of BNS added later on)], at Police Station City-1 Sangrur, District Sangrur. LAVISHA 2026.07.23 13:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh CRM-M-24107-2026 and CRM-M-37861-2026 -2- 2. Regular bail petition, i.e. CRM-M-70599-2025, filed by co- accused-Amandeep Singh alias Amar, was dismissed by this Court, vide order dated 10.03.2026. While dismissing the said petition, this Court observed that statements of the injured/eye-witnesses, namely Mohd. Shehbaz and Gagandeep Singh @ Doctor, were yet to be recorded. Accordingly, petition was dismissed at that stage. However, direction was issued to learned Trial Court to record the statements of aforesaid injured/eye- witnesses at the first instance. Liberty was also granted to the petitioner therein, to file a fresh petition after examination of the aforesaid witnesses. 3. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, present petitions are also dismissed, at this stage. 4. However, direction issued by this Court, vide order dated 10.03.2026 passed in CRM-M-70599-2025 shall be complied with, in true letter and spirit. 5. It is, however, clarified that present petitioners shall be at liberty to file fresh petitions, seeking regular bail after examination of the aforesaid injured/eye-witnesses. 6. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of other connected case. (SANJAY VASHISTH) 22.07.2026 JUDGE Lavisha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No LAVISHA 2026.07.23 13:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh