Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
AD 20 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA March 24, 2026 Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Ct. 6 Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction SG
CRM(A) 175 of 2026 Reject An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Dinhata P.S. Case No.399 of 2025 dated 07.08.2025 under Sections 21(c)/27A of the NDPS Act. And
In the matter of: Alamin Haque … petitioner
Mr. H.S. Podder … for the petitioner
Mr. A.S. Chakraborty
Mr. B. Roy … for the State
Report filed by the State is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that other than the statement of a co-accused, there is no material available against the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and relies on the case diary and the report. He submits that other than the statement of a co-accused, there are two other criminal cases pending against the petitioner. Both are under the provisions of the NDPS Act, one started in the year 2018 and the other in 2026. Considering the above, the other incriminating materials available in the case diary and the restrictions contained in Section 37 of the NDPS Act, I do not consider this to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail.
2
The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)