UCO BANK, MARKATNAGAR BRANCH, CUTTACK v. STATE OF ODISHA
WP(C)/9261/2026 · 2026-04-08
B P Routray
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3295 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3295 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No.9261 of 2026
UCO Bank, Markatnagar Branch, represented through its Branch Manager …. Petitioner Mr. Brahmananda Tripathy, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha, represented through its Principal Secretary, Home Department and Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. G. Tripathy, AGA Mr. S.K. Mishra, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. S. Acharya, counsel for O.P. No.5
CORAM:
SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER 8.4.2026
Order No.
02.
1. Heard Mr. B. Tripathy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. S.K. Mishra, learned senior counsel for opposite party no.5 and Mr. G. Tripathy, learned AGA for State opposite parties.
2. In course of hearing it is admitted by both parties that the power supply of the petitioner – Bank has been restored now. It is further submitted that the dispute between the petitioner and opposite party no.5 regarding continuance of the tenancy is now pending before learned District Judge, Cuttack in RFA No.135 of 2023 and 136 of
2023.
3. Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of permitting the parties to approach the appellate court for redressal of their grievance during pendency of the appeal.
( B.P. Routray) Judge M.K.Panda