CWP-17195-2026 [1] 120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17195-2026 Date of decision: 22.07.2026 Pardeep Kumar Sanghi ...Petitioner Versus Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. (HSIIDC) and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Kartik Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. In the present writ petition, following prayers have been made:- “CIVIL WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SEEKING ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, ESPECIALLY IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CLEARLY SPECIFY, DISCLOSE AND COMMUNICATE THE PRECISE NATURE, EXTENT AND PARTICULARS OF THE ALLEGED ZONING VIOLATIONS IN RESPECT OF PLOT NO. 15-A, OLD INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, NARNAUL, ALONG WITH ALL RELEVANT INSPECTION/SITE REPORTS AND DOCUMENTS FORMING THE BASIS THEREOF, AND PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.23 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-17195-2026 [2] FURTHER DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO GRANT A FAIR AND REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY TO THE PETITIONER TO REMOVE, RECTIFY AND COMPLY WITH SUCH ALLEGED VIOLATIONS/DEFICIENCIES, AS THE PETITIONER WERE NEVER INFORMED ABOUT THE EXACT NATURE OF THE SAME EARLIER AND ARE READY AND WILLING TO COMPLY WITH ALL LAWFUL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THE RESPONDENTS; AND IT IS FURTHER PRAYED TO ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE WRIT, THAT ONCE THE PROPERTY/PLOT STOOD CONVEYED BY THE RESPONDENT-DEPARTMENT THROUGH A DULY EXECUTED CONVEYANCE DEED IN FAVOUR OF THE ORIGINAL ALLOTTEE, THE PROPERTY BECAME LEGALLY TRANSFERABLE THROUGH A VALID REGISTERED SALE DEED AND NO REPEATED PRIOR PERMISSION/NOC FOR EVERY SUBSEQUENT TRANSFER CAN BE INSISTED UPON BY THE RESPONDENTS EXCEPT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW OR ANY SPECIFIC STATUTORY PROVISION. AND/OR FURTHER ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO ISSUE THE NECESSARY RE-ALLOTMENT LETTER/TRANSFER LETTER IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF PLOT NO. 15-A, OLD INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, NARNAUL, ON THE BASIS OF THE VALID REGISTERED SALE DEED EXECUTED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER AND UPON COMPLETION OF ALL REQUISITE FORMALITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. AND/OR FURTHER DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO DECIDE PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.23 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-17195-2026 [3] THE REPRESENTATION WHICH HAS BEEN SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES. AND/OR ANY SUCH OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION AS THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE INSTANT CASE” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that vide communication letter dated 01.10.2018, the petitioner was informed that there are certain zoning violations existing at the site as per the alleged site report dated 26.09.2018 and transfer in favour of the petitioner on the basis of the registered sale deed dated 30.03.2015 from the original allottee cannot be processed. It is submitted that however the details of the said violations have not been communicated to the petitioner and the petitioner is ready and willing to remove and rectify the same. It is submitted that in this regard, the petitioner has also given representation dated 12.01.2023 (Annexure P-2) and at this stage, he would be satisfied in case respondent No.2 is directed to decide the same in a time bound manner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the said representation 12.01.2023 (Annexure P-2) would be considered and decided by respondent No.2, within a period of one month from today and in case the pleas of the petitioner are found to be meritorious then necessary relief would also be granted to the petitioner. 4. Keeping in view the abovesaid facts and circumstances, the present writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.23 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-17195-2026 [4] consider and decide representation 12.01.2023 (Annexure P-2) by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from today. In case, respondent No.2 finds that the pleas raised by the petitioner are meritorious then necessary relief would also be granted to the petitioner expeditiously. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 22.07.2026 Pawan Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.23 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document