Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3292 (GAU)

MUSSTT SORIFA KHATUN AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

Bail Appln./522/2026 · 2026-03-24

Rajesh Mazumdar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010032722026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./522/2026 MUSSTT SORIFA KHATUN AND ANR W/O - SOHIDUL ALI ALIAS MOINUL ALI, RESIDENCE OF WARD NO. 12, CHAPORIGAON, POLICE STATION - NORTH LAKHIMPUR, DISTRICT - LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM. 2: MD SOHIDUL ALI ALIAS MOINUL ALI S/O - BILLAL ALI RESIDENCE OF WARD NO. 12 CHAPORIGAON POST OFFICE - KHELMATI POLICE STATION - NORTH LAKHIMPUR DISTRICT - LAKHIMPUR ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM, 2:SRI BHABA KEOT SON OF BHULA KEOT RESIDENCE OF BHEREKI MAJORCHAPORI POLICE STATION - PANIGAON DISTRICT - LAKHIMPUR ASSAM PIN NO. 787... Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U DUTTA, B DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR D BHATTACHARYA, AMICUS CURIAE, R2 Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 25.03.2026 Heard Mr. D. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. R.J. Baruah, learned APP for the State and Mr. D. Bhattacharya, learned Amicus Curiae for the respondent no.2. The scanned copy of the trial court record has been perused. Having gone through the evidence recorded thus far, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners are not entitled to the privilege of bail at this stage. Accordingly, this bail application is rejected at this stage. JUDGE Comparing Assistant