- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010145962016 NC: 2026:KHC:42771 WP No. 62077 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 62077 OF 2016 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT AMRUTHAMMA W/O LATE J.N.GOPALAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS. 2. SMT. SHYMALA D/O LATE J.N.GOPALAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS. 3. SMT.ARCHANA D/O LATE J.N.GOPALAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS. 4. SHRI. UDAYAKUMAR S/O LATE J.N.GOPALAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, R/AT SUNDARAPALYA VILLAGE, KYASAMBALLI HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-563114. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. V VISWANATHA SETTY .,ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010145962016 NC: 2026:KHC:42771 WP No. 62077 of 2016 AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR-563101. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KOLAR SUB-DIVISIION, KOLAR-563101. 3. THE TAHSILDAR BANGARPET TALUK, BANGARPET, KOLAR DISTRICT-563114. 4. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR KYASAMBALLI HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563114. 5. SHRI.C.RUKMANGADA REDDY S/O CHENGA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT BAZAAR STREET V KOTA, V.KOTA MANDALAM CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P - 517424. …RESPONDENTS (BY Smt. B P RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4 SRI MAHENDRA GOWDA C R, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS WRIT PETITON IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS ON THE FILE OF THE R-1 AUTHORITY IN R.A. PETITION NO.71/14-15 AND ALSO R-2 AUTHORITY IN RA NO.515[A]/2011-12 AND QUASH THE ORDER DTD16.9.2014 IN R.A. NO.515[A]/2011-12 PASSED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANNEXURE-S AND ALSO ORDER DTD13.7.2016 IN R.A. PETITION NO.71/14-15 PASSED BY THE R-1 AUTHORITY AS PER ANNEXURE-T BY ALLOWING THE W.P. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010145962016 NC: 2026:KHC:42771 WP No. 62077 of 2016 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioners are challenging the order dated 16.09.2014 (Annexure-S) passed by respondent No.2 and order dated 13.07.2016 passed by respondent No.1 (Annexure-T). 2. Sri V Vishwanatha Shetty, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners contended that land in question has been granted in favour of the father-in-law of petitioners, and accordingly, referred to Annexures-A to D1, and contended that, both the respondent-Authorities had committed an error in interfering with the revenue entries made in favour of the petitioners. 3. Per contra, Sri Mahendra Gowda C R, learned counsel for respondent No.5 contended that, respondent No.5 has purchased the land in question as per the registered sale dated 08.02.2012 from one V. Damodar and his sisters, and therefore, contended that, the - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010145962016 NC: 2026:KHC:42771 WP No. 62077 of 2016 petitioners have no legal right to claim the land in question. 4. Smt.B P Radha, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents No.1 to 4, supports the impugned orders. 5. In the light of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of the writ papers would indicate that, the petitioners have not produced the order of grant made in favour of them. Despite grant register at Annexure-A wherein issued by the respondent No.3 as to the grant made favour of J Narayana Shetty (father in-law of petitioner No.1). 6. In that view of the matter, the respondent No.5 had purchased the schedule property as per the registered sale deed dated 08.02.2012, and therefore, I am of the view that, the mutation has been made based on the - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010145962016 NC: 2026:KHC:42771 WP No. 62077 of 2016 registered sale deed, and therefore, it is open for the petitioners to establish their right in the land in question in a manner known to law. Accordingly, writ petition is rejected. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42