CRWP-8656 114 Suman State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. 1. been filed for issuance of directions to offic representation dated 14.07.2026 for protection of life and liberty of petitioner and her husband from the hands 2. her husband were agricultural land. A civil suit with regard to the court of learned directed the parties to maintain status quo, yet private respondents threatening the petitioner continued to use the passage. Apprehending danger to petitioner moved no action was taken thereon. 3. 8656-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH VERSUS of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Mr. Raghav Taneja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab *** Shalini Singh Nagpal, J.(Oral) The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for issuance of directions to official respondents to take action on representation dated 14.07.2026 for protection of life and liberty of petitioner and her husband from the hands of private respondents Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner and her husband were using a passage which was the only excess to their agricultural land. A civil suit with regard to the earned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Abohar directed the parties to maintain status quo, yet private respondents threatening the petitioner and her husband with dire consequences if they to use the passage. Apprehending danger to petitioner moved a representation, Annexure P no action was taken thereon. Notice of motion to official respon 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8656-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.07.2026 Petitioner Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL dvocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab. Article 226 of the Constitution of India has ial respondents to take action on representation dated 14.07.2026 for protection of life and liberty of of private respondents No.4 to 8. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner and using a passage which was the only excess to their agricultural land. A civil suit with regard to the passage was pending in the , Abohar. In that suit, the court directed the parties to maintain status quo, yet private respondents were and her husband with dire consequences if they to use the passage. Apprehending danger to their life and liberty, representation, Annexure P-2 to official respondents but Notice of motion to official respondents. M) .2026 Petitioner Respondents Article 226 of the Constitution of India has ial respondents to take action on representation dated 14.07.2026 for protection of life and liberty of Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner and using a passage which was the only excess to their pending in the n that suit, the court were and her husband with dire consequences if they life and liberty, but KAPIL 2026.07.23 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8656 4. accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents representation filed by the petitioner consideration. 5. Court, learned counsel for the petitioner conceded that petitioner and respondents No.4 to 8 are co to common passage been instituted. narrates any specific instances alleged threats primarily of a civil nature exercised to intervene 6. 7. 22.07.2026 Kapil 8656-2026 Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punja accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents representation filed by the petitioner has been received and is under consideration. During the course of arguments learned counsel for the petitioner conceded that petitioner and respondents No.4 to 8 are co-sharers in the joint holding. The dispute relates to common passage in joint land, regarding which a civil suit has already been instituted. Neither representation Annexure P any specific instances, with particular date and time regarding the alleged threats extended by private respondents. primarily of a civil nature and writ jurisdiction of this Court cannot be to intervene in the civil dispute pending Dismissed. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Reportable : 2 Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. He submits that has been received and is under During the course of arguments, on a pointed query by the learned counsel for the petitioner conceded that petitioner and joint holding. The dispute relates regarding which a civil suit has already n Annexure P-2 nor the petition particular date and time regarding the by private respondents. The matter appears to be jurisdiction of this Court cannot be pending before the Civil court. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE Reasoned : Yes/No Yes/No who is present in Court, submits that has been received and is under , on a pointed query by the learned counsel for the petitioner conceded that petitioner and joint holding. The dispute relates regarding which a civil suit has already 2 nor the petition particular date and time regarding the The matter appears to be jurisdiction of this Court cannot be (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) KAPIL 2026.07.23 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document