CRWP-8562-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 129 CRWP-8562-2026 Date of Decision: 20.07.2026 KAILASH CHANDER AND OTHERS ... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr.Akshay Kumar Dahiya, Advocate for Mr. Mukul Khatri, Advocate for the petitioners. ***** H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking appropriate directions to respondent No.2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the instance of the private respondents No. 3 to 5 and also to restrain the official respondents/police officials from harassing, threatening and conducting illegal domiciliary visits to the residence of the petitioners. A further prayer has also been made to take appropriate action against the officials respondents No. 3 to 5, as they are harrasing the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are being harrassed on the ground that their son is being involved in some criminal activities. It is further submitted that the respondents No. 3 to 5/police officials are repeatedly summoning the petitioners to the police station on the pretext of conducting an enquiry and are threatening to falsely implicate them in criminal cases with a view to coercing them into withdrawing the legal proceedings initiated by them. He further submits that the petitioners have already ANJAL GUPTA 2026.07.22 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8562-2026 -2- submitted a representation dated 15.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) to the concerned police authorities in this regard; however, no action has been taken thereon. It is contended that the petitioners have a genuine apprehension of being falsely implicated and subjected to unnecessary harassment at the hands of the official respondents. Accordingly, it is prayed that appropriate protection be granted to the petitioners in accordance with law and that, in the event their presence is required for any enquiry or investigation, prior notice under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, be served upon them. 3. Notice of motion to the official respondents. 4. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 1 to 5 and submits that investigation shall be carried out as per law. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, as well as the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the official respondents that, in case the presence of the petitioners is required for the purpose of any enquiry or investigation in the present case, they shall be served with a notice at least three days in advance before requiring their appearance in accordance with law. 7. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 20.07.2026 (H.S.GREWAL) Anjal JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No ANJAL GUPTA 2026.07.22 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document