Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010063322018 NC: 2026:KHC:43353 WP No. 18443 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.18443 OF 2018 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. VEERAREDDY S/O LATE MUNISHAMYREDDY, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, DODDADUNNASANDRA GRAMA, ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-563 101.
2.
SRI. BHADRAREDDY S/O LATE MUNISHAMYREDDY, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, DODDADUNASANDRA GRAMA, ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-563 101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHRIHARI K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. NAGAPPA S/O LATE KUNTUMUNIYAPPA,
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010063322018 NC: 2026:KHC:43353 WP No. 18443 of 2018
R/AT DODDADUMMASANDRA VILLAGE, ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-563 101.
2.
THE TAHASILDAR HOSKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-563 101.
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-563 101.
4.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU-563 101.
5. MUNIREDDY S/O LATE MUNISWAMY REDDY, R/AT DODDADUMMASANDRA VILLAGE, ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-563 101. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.D. BASAVANNA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R2 TO R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO OQUASH THE ORDER DATED 31.03.2018 IN REVISION
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010063322018 NC: 2026:KHC:43353 WP No. 18443 of 2018
PETITION NO.82/2017 ON THE FILE OF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, R-4 HEREIN FILED AS ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
1. In this Writ Petition, petitioners are assailing the order dated 31.03.2018 in R.P.No.82/2017 (Annexure-A) passed by respondent No.2.
2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, on careful consideration of factual aspects on record would indicate that the validity of the unregistered partition deed dated 10.06.1974 has to be considered in respect of the title claimed by the parties and therefore, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this Writ Petition and
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010063322018 NC: 2026:KHC:43353 WP No. 18443 of 2018
petitioners have to establish right over the property in question in a manner known to law.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. 4, Pending applications do not survive for consideration.
Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8