M/S MYPAYOINT INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/7088/2026 · 2026-04-28
Anuroop Singhi
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3289 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3289 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:17999] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7088/2026 M/s Mypayoint Infotech Private Limited, 6 L.n Hospital Building, Hero Chawk, Neemrana, Alwar, Rajasthan-301705, A Registered Firm, Through Its Authorized Signatory And One Of The Partner Prakash Tanwar, S/o Cheetar Ram, Aged About 43 Years, R/o 509, Tower 7, Royal Society, Neemrana District Kotputli-Bheror, Rajasthan 301705. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur-302005.
2. A.u Small Finance Bank, Through Its Branch Manager, Khasra No. 2150,2151,2152,201 Raghu Marg, Lakhanda Wala Kua, Vishnu Priya, Opp Govt. Children Hospital, Alwar, Rajasthan 301001.
3. Director General Of Police, Cyber Crime, Police Headquarters, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Station House Officer, Cyber Crime Police, Rajagopal Reddy Road, Buckinghampeta, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, 520002. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dikshant Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI
Order 28/04/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, seeks liberty to approach the concerned bank for redressal of petitioner’s grievance, more particularly, in light of Clause 10 – Grievance Redressal Mechanism of Section III of the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) dated 02.01.2026 issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs.
[2026:RJ-JP:17999] (2 of 2) [CW-7088/2026]
2. Taking note of the above limited submission, liberty as prayed for is granted to the petitioner.
3. In the event, the petitioner approaches the competent authorities in terms of the said SOP, the concerned authorities of the State and the Bank are directed to ensure that the grievance of the petitioner is duly considered strictly in accordance with the terms as provided in the SOP and within the time-frame prescribed therein. The timeline stipulated under the said SOP shall be mandatorily and strictly adhered to by the concerned authorities.
4. With the aforesaid liberty and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
5. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
6. However, if even after availing the remedies as provided under the Grievance Redressal Mechanism of the said SOP before the competent authorities, the petitioner’s grievance or cause of action still survives, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail appropriate legal remedies in accordance with law, if so advised.
(ANUROOP SINGHI),J DANISH USMANI /44