20.08.2026 Item No. 23 Ct. No. 39 C.R.M.(A) 1911 of 2026 AN (REJECTED) In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Panskura Police Station Case No. 369 of 2026 dated 18.05.2026 under Sections 109 / 115(2) / 117(2) / 3(5) / 324(4) / 329(3) / 329(4) / 76 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1421 of 2026 now pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tamluk, Purba Medinipur. In the matter of : Sk. Alamgir & ors. … Petitioners. Mr. S. Shah Mr. A. Bhattacharyya …for the Petitioners. Mr. Koustav Lal Mukherjee …for the State. Mr. Sumit Routh … for de facto complainant 1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. The dispute originally arose between the children of the parties and subsequently, it reached upto the parents of the children. He prays for anticipatory bail for the petitioners on any terms and conditions. 2. On the other hand, learned advocate representing the State produces the memo of evidence and the case diary and relies upon the injury report of the victim as well as the statement recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS, 2023. He opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 3. Learned advocate appearing for the de facto complainant strongly opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 4. Having heard the learned advocates for the respective parties and upon perusing the materials available on record, the case diary, including the injury report and the statement recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS, this Court finds that this is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners considering the injuries suffered by the victim. 5. In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail in favour of the present petitioner, and the prayer for anticipatory bail is thus, rejected. 6. C.R.M.(A) 1911 of 2026 stands dismissed. 7. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 8. The concerned Department is directed to supply urgent certified Photostat copy of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) 2 3