Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32874 (KAR)

SRI. REVANNA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/11608/2026 · 2026-08-06

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010255092026 NC: 2026:KHC:41874 WP No. 11608 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 11608 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. REVANNA S/O LATE ERABALAPPA,, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT REDDYHALLI VILLAGE, GOPANAHALLI POST, CHALLAKERE - 577 522, CHITRADURGA DIST. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ABHISHEK M.B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DC BUILDING, CHITRADURGA - 577 501. 3. THE ASSITANT COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DC BUILDING, CHITRADURGA - 577 501 Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010255092026 NC: 2026:KHC:41874 WP No. 11608 of 2026 4. THE TAHSHILDAR CHALLAKERE TALUK OFFICE, CHALLAKERE - 577 522. CHITRADURGA DIST. 5. G. GOPALA KRISHNA BIN LATE GEJJAPPA, PURPORTED CLASS-2 LEGAL HEIR OF DECEASED THIPPAIAH, AGE UNKNOWN, R/AT VENNUKALLU GUDDDA VILLAGE, HIRIYUR - 577 599. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. POORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER BEARING NO.RP-80/2024 DATED 16.04.2025 PRODUCED AT ANNX-G PASSED BY THE R2 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER WHICH IS REQUIRED TO BE QUASHED AND SET ASIDE AS ILLEGAL UNFAIR ARBITRARY AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNKNOWN TO THE LEGAL PROCEDURE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010255092026 NC: 2026:KHC:41874 WP No. 11608 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Learned HCGP accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing the Order dated 16.04.2025 passed by respondent No.2 (Annexure-G), inter alia sought for direction to respondent No.2 to restore the name of the petitioner in the RTC extracts. 3. Heard Sri. Abhishek M.B., leaned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Spoorthy Hegde N., learned HCGP appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4. 4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of the order passed by respondent No.2, it would indicate that the suit in OS No.365/2022 is pending consideration before the competent Civil Court. 5. In that view of the matter, it is the duty of the petitioner to establish right over the property in question and thereafter, approach the revenue authorities for modification of the revenue entries. In that view of the matter, I am of the - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010255092026 NC: 2026:KHC:41874 WP No. 11608 of 2026 view that, no interference is called for in this writ petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18