AJAD KUMAR AND OTHERS ......APPELLANTS Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .........RESPONDENTS 269 LPA-881-2026 (O&M) STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ….APPELLANTS VS. RAGHUBIR SINGH ….RESPONDENT 270 LPA-927-2026 (O&M) STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...APPELLANTS VS. JARNAIL SINGH ….RESPONDENT 271 LPA-983-2026 (O&M) STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ….APPELLANTS VS. ZILE SINGH ...RESPONDENT NITIN 2026.07.20 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document LPA-1174-2025 (O&M) and other connected cases -2- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: None for the appellants (in LPA-1174-2025) & for the respondents (in LPAs-881 and 983 of 2026). Dr. Neha Awasthi, Addl. A.G., Haryana for respondents No. 1 to 3 (in LPA-1174-2025) and for the appellants-State (in LPAs-881, 927 and 983 of 2026). Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate, for the respondent (in LPA-927-2026). None for the private respondents in other appeals ***** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the parties submits that although the learned Single Judge declined the benefit claimed by the employees, the Division Bench, in LPA-1810-2025 titled Aas Mohammad and others vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on 23.04.2026 (whereby a bunch of 98 cases has been decided), has directed the State of Haryana/its Bodies/Corporations/Nigams to consider the cases of the employees within a period of six months for regularisation of the service. It is, therefore, submitted that the case of the employees concerned be also considered in terms of the directions issued by the Division Bench in the aforesaid judgment. 2. Accordingly, as prayed for by the parties, the appeals stand disposed of in terms of the judgment passed in Aas Mohammad’s case (supra). 3. Since no one has appeared on behalf of the appellants in LPA- NITIN 2026.07.20 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document LPA-1174-2025 (O&M) and other connected cases -3- 1174-2025, and respondents in LPA Nos. 881 and 983 of 2026, if any further grievance of the appellants/respondents therein still survives, they shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application in accordance with law. 4. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 5. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of the other connected case. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE JULY 15, 2026 (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) nitin JUDGE Whether Speaking Yes Whether Reportable No NITIN 2026.07.20 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document