SANJAY KUMAR VERMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
C.Rev./97/2025 · 2026-04-02
Deepak Roshan
Review Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3287 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3287 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:9489
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Civil Review No. 97 of 2025 Sanjay Kumar Verma, aged about 59 years, S/o late Sudarshan Ram Verma Present Residence at Behind Birsa Munda Agro Park, Laxman Nagar Gumla, PO & PS-Gumla, District-Gumla Earlier R/o Deputy Commissioner, Residence Road, Gumla, PO and PS- Gumla, Dist.-Gumla
... … Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary, having its office at Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, PO and PS-Dhurwa, District Ranchi
2. The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, PO and PS Dhurwa
3. The Director, Directorate, Panchayati Raj Government of Jharkhand, having its office F.F.P Building, Dhurwa, PO and PS-Dhurwa, District Ranchi
4. District Development Commissioner cum Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Gumla, PO and PS-Gumla, District Gumla
5. Adhyach, Zila Parishad, Gumla, Gumla, PO and PS-Gumla, District Gumla
6. The Secretary, Zila Parishad, Gumla, Gumla, PO and PS Gumla, District Gumla
... … Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sidhartha Roy, Advocate For Opposite Party(s)
: Mr. J.F. Toppo, GA-V
Mr. Neil Abhijit Toppo, AC to GA-V
--------
Order No. 03 /Dated: 2nd April 2026
Heard learned counsel for the review petitioner.
2. While referring to paragraph no.5 of the order dated 11.06.2025 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6637 of 2018 learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that as per paragraph no.17 of the Resolution the petitioner is entitled for the 2nd ACP benefit, however, the same has not been considered by this Court.
3. After going through the order dated 11.06.2025 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6637 of 2018 it appears that there is a finding given in the order as such if the petitioner is aggrieved, he may challenge the order
2026:JHHC:9489
2
before the appellate Court.
4. With the aforesaid observation, the instant Civil Review stands dismissed.
5. Pending I.As, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) 2nd April 2026 Amit Uploaded on 08/04/2026