AT CHANDIGARH 126 CWP-16534-2026 Date of Decision: 20.07.2026 VINITA @ VINITA VASHISHT ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA Present: Ms. Pinki Mehla, Advocate (through VC) for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Vashisth, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Ankita Malhotra, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for respondent No.3. ***** SUVIR SEHGAL , J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed, inter alia, for issuance of writ of mandamus directing respondent No.2 (Bar Council of India) to decide petitioner's miscellaneous petition, whereby order dated 11.04.2026, Annexure P-7, has been assailed. 2. Ms. Ankita Malhotra, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.2 and has filed Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 3. Mr. Lamba, who has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.3, submits that elections to the General Body of Bar Associations across RIMPAL RANI 2026.07.23 10.51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-16534-2026 :2: States of Punjab and Haryana and U.T., Chandigarh, have already been announced. He has placed on record a xerox copy of intimation sent to various Bar Associations. 4. In view of the above development, counsel for the petitioner seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the writ petition. 5. Dismissed as withdrawn. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) JUDGE 20.07.2026 Rimpal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RIMPAL RANI 2026.07.23 10.51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document