IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 136 CRM-M-19214-2026 Date of Decision: 23.07.2026 DAVINDER VERMA ….PETITIONER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Additional AG, Haryana. Mr. Mayank Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Anil Mehta, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** MANISHA BATRA, J.(Oral) 1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Even on the last date of hearing, none had appeared on his behalf. 2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition, hence, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. Since the main petition has been dismissed for want of prosecution. (MANISHA BATRA) 23.07.2026 JUDGE pry Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No PRIYANKA 2026.07.23 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document