24/08 2026 AD/13/18 266312 NANDY (DISMISSED) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/20141/2026 SOURAV DOME VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Mr. S.S. Arefin, Advocate Ms. Kaniz Kulsum, Advocate Ms. Anamika Jana, Advocate ……for the Petitioner Mr. Pulokesh Bajpayee, Advocate Mr. Sourav Halder, Advocate ……for the State 1. Affidavit of service, as filed, be kept with the record. 2. As fairly submitted by Mr. Arefin, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, the selfsame ground on which the writ petition has been filed; has been urged before the West Bengal State Administrative Tribunal and is pending since 2023. 3. Thus, there does not seem to be any urgency in this matter as of now. 4. In line with the decision of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in WPST/209/2025 with WPST/210/2025 (Anindo Sundar Das vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.), this writ petition cannot be entertained. 5. The writ-petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. 6. The petitioner is granted liberty to take appropriate steps in the matter. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.) P a g e | 2