Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32856 (KAR)

BABY TRISHIKA S., v. SMT. NANDINI SAVANURA,

MFA/2207/2025 · 2026-07-11

Lok Adalath

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK-ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 CONCILIATORS PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T. AND SRI NAMAN VANKDARI M., MEMBER MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.2207 OF 2025 (MV-I) (LOK-ADALAT NO.2430 OF 2026) BETWEEN: BABY TRISHIKA S D/O SOMASHEKHARAIAH M S AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS SINCE APPELLANT IS MINOR REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER/NEXT FRIEND SRI SOMASHEKHARAIAH M S S/O SHANTHAIAHA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.16, 2ND MAIN ROAD 6TH CROSS RUDRAPPA COMPLEX VITTALANAGAR BENGALURU SOUTH BENGALURU ...APPELLANT (BY SRI KAILAS SHANKAR P S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. NANDINI SAVANURA MAJOR NO.012 B BLOCK BRUNDAVAN GARDENIA 4TH CROSS 4TH MAIN ROAD, HANUMANAGIRI LAYOUT RAMANJENEYANAGAR BENGALURU 2. THE MANAGER GO DIGIT GEN. INS. CO. LTD. NO.95 4TH B CROSS ROAD INDUSTRIAL LAYOUT 5TH BLOCK KORAMANGALA BENGALURU Digitally signed by SHASHIREKHA K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 3. SRI SHIVANNA S/O ANNAIAH MALLADEVARAPURA VILLAGE KATTAYA HOBLI HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHIVANNEGOWDA., ADVOCATE FOR R2) * * * THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 28.06.2024 PASSED IN M.V.C. NO.303 OF 2020 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AND MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL AT BENGALURU ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK-ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the appellant-claimant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant-claimant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its Authorised Officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent- Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees five lakh only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within a period of six 3 weeks' from the date of preparation of award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the judgment and award passed by the Tribunal. 5. This miscellaneous first appeal stands disposed off in terms of the joint memo. The judgment and award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER KVK