Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32852 (CHH)

JAVINDAR SINGH v. THANWAR

MCC/764/2026 · 2026-08-17

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010310052026 2026:CGHC:36741-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 764 of 2026 • Javindar Singh S/o Shri Preetam Singh Saluja Aged About 53 Years R/o Krishna Colony, Bhatapara, Tah And P.S. Bhatapara, Distt. Baloda Bazar -Bhatapara, Civil And Revenue Distt. Baloda Bazar -Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Applicant versus 1. Thanwar W/o Shri Manrakhan Sahu, Aged About 57 Years R/o Hathanipara, Bhatapara, P.S. And Tah - Bhatapara, Distt. Baloda Bazar -Bhatapara, (C.G.) 2. Punnilal S/o Shri Manrakhan Sahu, Aged About 55 Years R/o Hathanipara, Bhatapara, P.S. And Tah - Bhatapara, Distt. Baloda Bazar -Bhatapara, (C.G.) 3. Takram S/o Shri Manrakhan Sahu, Aged About 52 Years R/o Hathanipara, Bhatapara, P.S. And Tah - Bhatapara, Distt. Baloda Bazar -Bhatapara, (C.G.) 4. Kartik Ram S/o Shri Manrakhan Sahu Aged About 47 Years R/o Hathanipara, Bhatapara, P.S. And Tah - Bhatapara, Distt. Baloda Bazar -Bhatapara, (C.G.) 5. Panch Ram S/o Shri Manrakhan Sahu Aged About 44 Years R/o Hathanipara, Bhatapara, P.S. And Tah - Bhatapara, Distt. Baloda Bazar -Bhatapara, (C.G.) 6. Santosh S/o Shri Manrakhan Sahu, Aged About 42 Years R/o Hathanipara, Bhatapara, P.S. And Tah - Bhatapara, Distt. Baloda Bazar -Bhatapara, (C.G.) PRIYANKA VERMA Digitally signed by PRIYANKA VERMA Date: 2026.08.19 11:00:53 +0530 2 7. Phool Bai Widow Of Manrakhan Sahu, Aged About 70 Years R/o Hathanipara, Bhatapara, P.S. And Tah - Bhatapara, Distt. Baloda Bazar -Bhatapara, (C.G.) 8. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Baloda Bazar, Distt. Baloda Bazar -Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Respondents For Applicant : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For State : Mr. Amit Buxy, Deputy GA Division Bench Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal & Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board 18.08.2026 Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. 1. Heard on I.A. No.1/2026, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay in filing the application for restoration. 2. On due consideration and for the reasons assigned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay is condoned. 3. Also heard on application for restoration of F.A. No.321/2019. 4. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the instant MCC is allowed and F.A. No.321/2019 is directed to be restored to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Judge Priyanka