Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3284 (KAR)

SRI. MUNIKRISHNA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/11269/2026 · 2026-04-15

C M Poonacha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20278-DB WP No. 11269 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 11269 OF 2026 (GM-MM-S) BETWEEN: 1. SRI MUNIKRISHNA S/O. MR. RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT. GONNUR VILLAGE NARAYANAPURA POST VIJIPURA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU - 562 110 …PETITIONER (BY SRI BHAT GANAPATHI NARAYANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001 2. THE DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY KANIJA BHAVAN BENGALURU - 560 001 Digitally signed by VEERENDRA KUMAR K M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20278-DB WP No. 11269 of 2026 3. THE SENIOR GEOLOGIST DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT CHIKKABALLAPURA - 562 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K.S. HARISH, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY APPROPRIATE DIRECTION DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER'S APPLICATION DATED 13/04/2015, AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND GRANT THE QUARRY LEASE IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY WITHIN STIPULATED PERIOD & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that appropriate directions be issued to respondents to consider the petitioner's application dated 13.04.2015 for grant of quarrying lease in an area measuring 6 acres 10 guntas falling in Sy.No.26 of - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20278-DB WP No. 11269 of 2026 Chunchanapalya village, Goluru Hobli, Bagepalli Taluk, Chikkaballapura District. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner's application was not considered and in the circumstances, he had filed a writ petition being W.P.No.1540/2016, which was disposed of by an order dated 03.02.2016 directing the respondent-authorities to consider the petitioner's application. The said application was thereafter rejected by an endorsement dated 01.07.2017. 3. The petitioner states that notwithstanding the said rejection a spot inspection was conducted and a technical report was submitted on 21.02.2019, inter alia, stating that there were no technical objections for considering the petitioner's application. Notwithstanding the same, the petitioner's application was not taken up thereafter. This led the petitioner to file a writ petition being W.P.No.52611/2019, challenging the endorsement dated 01.07.2017, whereby his application was rejected. This Court allowed the said writ petition by order dated 02.06.2020 and directed the respondent-authorities to consider the petitioner's - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20278-DB WP No. 11269 of 2026 application and pass appropriate orders within a period of four months from the said date. 4. The record does not indicate that the petitioner has taken any steps for pursuing his application after 02.06.2020. After a lapse of almost five and a half years, the petitioner made a representation dated 22.01.2026 and in view of non consideration of his application, has filed the present petition. 5. The learned Government Advocate submits that the petitioner's application must have been considered in view of the orders passed by this Court dated 02.06.2020. He states that if the same has not been considered, the same would be considered within a period of four weeks from date. 6. In view of the above, we do not consider it apposite to pass any further orders. 7. In the event the petitioner's application has already been considered, the concerned authorities shall communicate the order to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from date. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20278-DB WP No. 11269 of 2026 8. Writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE KMV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12