HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17694 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. Learned Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection that dispute of the petitioner is with private individuals i.e. respondent Nos. 4 and 5 and such a writ petition is not maintainable. 3. In view of the above, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law. May 6, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd Mohiuddin Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Happu Kha .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad