Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32822 (CAL)

PINTU GAYEN AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/2475/2026 · 2026-08-19

Md Shabbar Rashidi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

19.08.2026 DL-43 Court No.551 [Bench ID-266058] (AD) (Allowed) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M. (A) 2475 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Rajapur Police Station Case No.200 of 2026 dated 12.06.2026 under Sections 126(2) /117(2) /118(2) /109/76/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising out of G.R. No.1753 of 2026 now pending before the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Uluberia, Howrah. And In the matter of: Pintu Gayen & Ors. ….petitioners Mr. Kunal Ganguly, Advocate …for the petitioners Mr. Subhendu Sinha Roy, Advocate Mr. Harshit Jaiswal, Advocate … for the State Mr. Arindam Jana, Advocate Mr. Saikat Guin, Advocate Ms. Anisha Parvin, Advocate … for the de facto complainant 1. Memo of evidence filed in Court be taken on record. 2. It is submitted by the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case due to the previous enmity. The instant case has been filed by the wife of the principal accused as a counter case of a case lodged by the petitioner no.1 under Section 103 of the BNS in order to put pressure upon the present petitioners. It has been submitted that no such incident ever took place. Petitioners pray for anticipatory bail. 3. Learned Advocate appearing for the State refers to the injury reports in the case diary. 4. Learned Advocate appearing for the State as well as 2 learned Advocate appearing for the de facto complainant opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 5. Having heard the submissions made on behalf of the parties and on going through the materials in the case diary, it appears that although the case diary contains injury reports but none of the injuries have been classified as “grievous” by the Medical Officer. 6. Considering the aforesaid circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and on condition that the petitioners will report before the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. 8. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. 3 9. C.R.M. (A) 2475 of 2026 is disposed of. (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.) ABHIJIT DAS Digitally signed by ABHIJIT DAS Date: 2026.08.19 19:27:51 +05'30'