Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010080572024 NC: 2026:KHC:41992 WP No. 4673 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 4673 OF 2024 (LA-RES) BETWEEN:
SMT. CHICKKAMMA W/O LATE K. NANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RESIDING AT ANCHECHITTANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571432. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SURENDRA KUMAR N., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA-571401.
2.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA-571401.
3.
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER HEMAVATHI LEFT BANK CANAL KAVERI NEERAVARI NIGAMA NIYAMITHA YEDIYUR, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572142.
4.
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NO.11, KAVERI NEERAVARI NIGAMA NIYAMITYA YEDIYUR SUB DIVISION, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572142. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKAR, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2;
SRI. K.S.BHEEMAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.3 AND 4)
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010080572024 NC: 2026:KHC:41992 WP No. 4673 of 2024
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE SECOND RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 01.07.2023 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-H AND TO PAY COMPENSATION TOWARDS 31 COCONUT TREES WHICH WERE CUT AND REMOVED IN SY.NO.79/1-A, 79/2-A OF BYRANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK FOR A SUM OF RS.1,78,374/- AS FIXED BY THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF HORTICULTURE AS PER ANNEXURE-B A/W INTEREST AND STATUTORY BENEFITS AS PROVIDED UNDER LAND ACQUISITION ACT, WITHIN A STIPULATED TIME AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no appearance for the petitioner. Copy of the writ petition is also not served to the
learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4.
Hence, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
PMR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52