Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32817 (CAL)

NASIRUL SK @ NASIRUL SAIKH v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/1863/2026 · 2026-08-18

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

18.08.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 13. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (A) 1863 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Mangalkote Police Station Case No. 141 of 2025 dated 16.05.2025 under Sections 329(4)/103(1)/351(2)/61(2)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of : Nasirul Sk @ Nasirul Saikh ……Petitioner. Mr. Swapan Banerjee Mr. Debapratim Guha Mr. Kunal Ganguly Mr. Diptendu Banerjee Mr. Subhodip Maity ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Pinaki Bhattacharyya, Sr. Govt. Adv. Mr. Amartya Mohan Bhattacharyya ….for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not named in the FIR and his name appeared in the charge sheet. Learned advocate for the State has produced the case diary. I find that the FIR reflects that the face of three persons were covered and it was these three persons who inflicted vital blow on the deceased resulting in his death. 2 Having considered the gruesome manner in which the victim was assaulted to death, I am not inclined to give the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner as he had been evading the process of law. Accordingly, CRM (A) 1863 of 2026 is dismissed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)