- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010520422022 NC: 2026:KHC:41820 WP No. 22619 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 22619 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. S A KUSHAL KUMAR AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS. 2. S A MAHINDRA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. BOTH S/O S. ANANDA MURTHY, R/AT NO.15, SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, JAKKUR POST, BANGALORE - 560 054. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B. VACHAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. B NAGARAJ S/O BACHANNA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT HOODI VILLAGE, K R PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK. 2. MRS MUNIYAMMA W/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, R/A SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, JAKKUR POST, BANGALORE-560054. 3. MR RAJANNA S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS. Digitally signed by ANNAPURNA G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010520422022 NC: 2026:KHC:41820 WP No. 22619 of 2022 4. MR R MOHAN KUMAR S/O RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. 5. MR R TRISHUL S/O RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. RESPONDENTS 3 TO 5 ARE R/AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, JAKKUR POST, BANGALORE - 560 054 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. N. JAGADISH BALIGA, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 03.03.2021 PASSED BY THE LEARNED HONBLE XXX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT BANGALORE, IN O.S.NO.4877/2004 ON I.A.NO.10 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-Y IN SO FAR AS IT LIMITS THE PETITIONERS FOR SETTING UP THEIR OWN DEFENCE AND CONTEST THE SUIT ON MERITS ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010520422022 NC: 2026:KHC:41820 WP No. 22619 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Sri B. Vachan, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the suit has been disposed of. He further submits that in view of the disposal of the suit, the present writ petition renders infructuous. However, he submits that steps are being taken to revive the suit and, if the suit is revived, he may be permitted to revive the present writ petition. 2. The submission is placed on record. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission and with liberty as sought for, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE SHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8