MR. B.S. RAJASHEKHAR v. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-II
WP/6694/2022 · 2026-08-03
Jyoti M
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32812 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32812 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010136502022 NC: 2026:KHC:40397 WP No. 6694 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 6694 OF 2022 (L-PF) BETWEEN:
MR. B.S.RAJASHEKHAR, S/O. SANNABASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, M/S. GEMINI SECURITY AND ALLIED SERVICES, NO.648, 5TH CROSS, LENIN NAGAR, NITTUVALLI NEW EXTENSION, DAVANAGERE-577004. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GOVINDARAJ K.JOISA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAJESH SHETTIGAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-II, REGIONAL OFFICE, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, SHREE KARTHIK PLAZA 2ND FLOOR, DURGAGUDI MAIN ROAD, SHIVAMOGGA-577201.
2.
UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, NO.14, BHIKAIJI CAMA PLACE, NEW DELHI-110066 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY …RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010136502022 NC: 2026:KHC:40397 WP No. 6694 of 2022
(BY SMT. M.R.SHALAMALA, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. NAGENDRA A. CGC FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER Sri.Govindaraj K. Joisa, counsel on behalf of Sri.Rajesh Shettigar, for the petitioner, Smt.Shalamala, counsel for respondent No.1 and Sri.Nagendra A., CGC for respondent No.2. appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. Counsel, therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010136502022 NC: 2026:KHC:40397 WP No. 6694 of 2022
The oral submission and the memo is placed on record. As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.
Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39