Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32804 (CAL)

MAYANK BOTHRA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/12397/2026 · 2026-08-05

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

126 Ranajit (AR.CT) 05.08.2026 Ct.05 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. NO 12397 OF 2026 Mayank Bothra -vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Debasish Ghosh, Mr. Lalit Baid, Ms. Sudeshna Ghosh, Ms. Sanjana Shaw, Mr. Kuldeep Das ….for the petitioner. Mr. Suryaneel Das, Ms. Anita Kundu, Ms. Sumita Sarkar ….for the State. 1. Learned advocate representing the petitioner on instruction submits that grievance of the petitioner is redressed in view of decision taken by Authority of Haryana Police. 2. State respondents are represented by learned advocates. 3. In view of such submission made on behalf of the petitioner, no further order need be passed on this writ petition. 4. Writ petition stands disposed of. 5. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)